How
should the UN be reformed?
Introduction:
Start with a reference to a recent event or statement of importance
to the question. For example 2018-2019
Give
some of the reasons why the UN is important and thus why it needs to
be an effective organization. It is
simply the largest, most important and universal international
organization. It is the main international organization responsible
for promoting and ensuring peaceful relations between states and
respect for human rights, so if it fails in its mission the global
community is in trouble. It is the main public forum for
international debate, and in many ways its institutions and protocols
set the moral standards for how actors within the international
community should act. It is the world’s premier aid organization
and provider of emergency, development and educational programs.
Line
of argument: this
essay will argue that there is general consensus about the need for
UN Reform but less agreement about how this should be achieved. It
will also be argued that radical UN Security Council reform is
unlikely and the structural reforms called for in other areas and
being launched in 2019 by UN Secretary-General António Guterres may
also prove in practice quite difficult. It can be argued that the
real role of the UN and ICC is to create a normative environment and
language regarding relations between states based on peaceful
coexistence and cooperation, collective security and mutual respect
in the hope that states and individuals will gradually reform and
conform over time.
Why
is there a need for reform? Why is the current structure of the UNSC
unrepresentative? How could it be made more representative? Why is
this difficult? What are the voting requirements in the General
Assembly and on the SC for any reform to be adopted? What's the
current situation?
Wider
reforms: UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan 1997-2006 /management / waste /
bureaucracy / inefficiencies /development/ duplication and
overlapping / recruitment / corruption, accountability and immunity /
effectiveness of UN peace-keeping and humanitarian operations (R2P or
RtoP) or the lack of an operation / The UN Human Rights Council / aid
dependence. What has been achieved since 2006? Why is it hard to make
progress on internal reform? What are the current reforms (2019)
designed to achieve?
What
are the political limitations on any major changes given the UN's
history? Idealism / Realism / Functionalism / what happened to the
League of Nations.
Conclusion:
Thus, given what we have said above, the international community, the
UN Secretary General and Secretariat and the UN members should
continue to push for reform of the SC and wider reforms in the way
the UN functions but we should be realistic about the prospects. One
could argue, in fact, that the real role of the UN and ICC is to
create a normative environment and language regarding peaceful
relations between states, democratic values and human rights in the
hope that states and individuals will gradually reform and conform
over time. The UN is responsible for creating and reinforcing the
diplomatic language and behavioural norms for international relations
based on peaceful coexistence and cooperation, collective security
and mutual respect. If we compare the cooperation and dialogue
between states today and at any time before or during the Cold War it
would be difficult to deny that the UN and the international
community have made some very real progress.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento
Nota. Solo i membri di questo blog possono postare un commento.