Line
of argument: This essay
will argue that there are several different ways that culture
can affect or be part of foreign policy.
Say that you will briefly summarize these and then focus on ######
since you think this is the most important idea.
Briefly explain and give examples of different ways
that culture can affect or be part of foreign policy:
a) cultural differences and how these could create
misunderstanding or lead to one side feeling offended or badly
treated in negotiations. Give examples. So diplomats need to be aware
of and respect and to conform as far as possible to the norms of the
host country. This is true not just at work but during their free
time too as representatives of Italian culture.
b) Businessmen, tourists, sportsmen and fans are all now
considered cultural representatives who can enhance or damage the
image of the country.
c) Samuel
Huntington's argument that international relations depend on the
division of the world into cultural areas and countries should be
wary of interference in other cultural areas where their actions and
intentions may be misunderstood and worsen relations. For example,
exporting democracy.
d)
International conventions to protect minority cultures and cultural
heritage and Italy's role in this.
e) Multiculturalism
– We should recognize multiculturalism as a growing reality of
modern European life, and the need for multiculturalism as a positive
and necessary force to bridge ethnic, religious and national
divisions and tensions within society and between states. The EU as
the biggest experiment in this. Its successes and failures, current
tensions. The idea of a shared European culture of values.
f)
Cultural diplomacy as soft power and the role of the diplomat,
particularly the cultural
attaché, in promoting his country's culture through the organization
of and in providing information about exhibitions
and cultural events.
I would focus on the
latter (f) and give lots of examples of what Italy is doing at
different cultural institutes around the world and how this affects
the image foreigners have of Italy. I would argue that the goal is
winning 'hearts and minds' of the public abroad rather than foreign
governments. So people to people rather than government to
government. This will also help to boost tourism and the demand for
Italian products.
Conclusion: Culture
plays a fundamental role in diplomatic activity in various ways and
the more international relations are based on involving people rather
than simply governments the greater its role will become in terms of
soft power to promote good relations and good will or, if
misunderstood or ignored, to damage relations.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento
Nota. Solo i membri di questo blog possono postare un commento.